New Delhi: Environmentalist and education reform advocate Sonam Wangchuk has strongly responded to criticism over his decision to end his 26-day hunger strike, questioning those who doubted his commitment to the protest.
AFTER 26 DAYS OF HUNGER DO I NEED TO PROVE MY SINCERITY !!!
Do please watch and help spread the word. Find the full 22 minutes video on my YouTube Channel: Sonam Wangchuk pic.twitter.com/6CO3tjZsSD— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) July 24, 2026
Addressing supporters, Wangchuk asked, “Do I need a character certificate after 26 days of hunger?”, asserting that his fast was undertaken with complete honesty and dedication. He said that those questioning his intentions were attempting to divert attention from the core issues behind the agitation.
Wangchuk Defends Decision to End Hunger Strike
Wangchuk clarified that ending the hunger strike should not be viewed as abandoning the movement. He emphasized that protests are meant to achieve meaningful dialogue and reforms, not become a test of personal endurance.
He said the struggle would continue through peaceful and democratic means, adding that the movement is larger than any individual and remains focused on its objectives.
Hits Out at ‘Smear Campaign’
Responding to criticism on social media and from some sections of the public, Wangchuk said he was surprised that after nearly a month without food, some people were demanding proof of his sincerity.
He remarked that instead of discussing the concerns raised by the protesters, critics were trying to question his credibility. “Do I need a character certificate after 26 days of hunger?” he asked, dismissing the allegations against him.
Protest Continues Despite Fast Ending
Although Wangchuk has ended his fast, he said the campaign would continue through public participation and peaceful demonstrations. He urged supporters to remain united and committed to the movement’s demands.
The activist reiterated that the purpose of the protest is to seek accountability and constructive solutions, expressing hope that the government would engage in meaningful dialogue rather than allowing attention to shift away from the issues being raised.
Wangchuk’s remarks come amid ongoing public debate over his hunger strike and the broader movement, with supporters backing his stand while critics continue to question his decision to end the fast after 26 days.