Washinngton: A United States federal trade court has ruled that former President Donald Trump’s broad tariff measures were unlawful, marking a significant setback for his trade policy and raising fresh questions about the limits of presidential authority in economic decisions.
The Court of International Trade found that the tariffs imposed under Trump’s administration—introduced using emergency trade powers—exceeded the authority granted by Congress. Judges ruled that the legal justification used for the tariffs did not meet the requirements under existing trade law, making the measures “unauthorized by law.”
The decision specifically targets a 10% global tariff framework and related import duties imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The court stated that such powers can only be used in limited circumstances and for short durations, which were not met in this case.
Although the ruling represents a major legal blow, it applies narrowly in scope. Some tariffs remain temporarily in effect while the administration pursues an appeal. Legal experts expect the case to potentially move to higher courts, including the possibility of Supreme Court review.
The ruling follows a series of legal challenges against Trump’s trade policies, many of which argue that his use of emergency powers to impose tariffs bypassed Congress’s constitutional authority over taxation and trade.
Business groups and import-dependent industries have welcomed the decision, saying the tariffs increased costs and created uncertainty in global supply chains. Meanwhile, supporters of the policy argue that tariffs were necessary to protect domestic industries and address trade imbalances.
The Biden-era and ongoing trade policy framework may now see adjustments depending on the final outcome of the appeals process.