Rewording of Clause 2 of Article 25: Sikh, Buddhism and Jainism separated from ‘Hindus’

MP from Jalandhar and former CM Charanjit Singh Channi had demanded an amendment to clause 2 of Article 25 of the Constitution. MP demanded differentiation between Sikh, Buddhism and Jainism from Hindu religion as they are distinct and have different practices.

Earlier as per According to Article 25(2) of the Indian Constitution, when referring to “Hindus,” it included Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, meaning that Sikhs are considered under the umbrella of “Hindus”.

Now after the recommendation, the clause has been amended. The recommendation was intended to clarify that these religious communities should be granted freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice, and propagate their distinctive religions

The amendment was recommended in the report of the National Commission to review the working of the Constituion.

The Commission’s opinion expressed in this section suggested the following:

1. Omission of Explanation II to Article 25:
   The Commission recommends omitting Explanation II to Article 25 of the Constitution. Explanation II currently states that the word “Hindu” includes Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, which could be seen as limiting the scope for religious freedom and differentiation within these communities.
2. Rewording of Clause 2(b) of Article 25:
   The Commission suggests rewording sub-clause (b) of Article 25(2) to make it more inclusive and focused on social welfare and reform. The proposed reworded clause would read:

   “(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu, Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of these religions.”