Delhi HC hearing: Kejriwal questions judge’s impartiality, cites 10 grounds

April 13, 2026

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal appeared in person in the Delhi High Court on Monday without a lawyer and presented his arguments in detail. This hearing was both legally and politically significant.

Allegations of not receiving a fair hearing
He alleged that in an earlier hearing, only the CBI’s arguments were heard and comments were made against the accused in their absence, raising questions about the fairness of the process.

Questions about the stay on ED proceedings
Kejriwal said that the court stayed the ED proceedings without any formal application, which raises questions about the judicial process.

The issue of stopping action against a CBI officer
He also objected to the fact that disciplinary action against a CBI officer was stayed without any application, which is unusual.

Short time to respond
Kejriwal said that only one week was given to respond to the 600-page order and the CBI’s appeal, which is significantly less than in normal cases.

Allegations of bias in the bail hearing
He alleged that some of the harsh words used during the bail hearing suggested a preconceived notion of the accused’s guilt.

7. Reference to Supreme Court orders
He said that the Supreme Court had overturned some earlier orders, indicating inconsistency in the case.

8. Allegations of bias in favor of investigating agencies
Kejriwal alleged that many of the court’s decisions appeared to favor the CBI and ED, raising questions about balance.

9. The issue of institutional and family ties
He questioned the judge’s impartiality, citing family members’ employment in the government legal system and their affiliation with certain organizations.

10. Reference to political statements
He also stated that statements made by senior leaders, which hinted at potential consequences, could impact the perception of judicial impartiality.