Rajasthan HC Raises Concern Over Vacancies in Child Rights Commission

February 21, 2026

The Rajasthan High Court on Friday raised serious concerns over the prolonged vacancies in the Rajasthan State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (RSCPCR) and sought a detailed response from the state government. The bench expressed worry that vacant posts were impairing the commission’s ability to function effectively and safeguard child rights in the state.

Vacancies Affecting Child Rights Body

During proceedings, the court observed that several key positions including those of commission members and essential officers have remained unfilled for an extended period. The judge noted that such prolonged vacancies undermine the effectiveness of the commission, affecting its capacity to address violations of child rights, monitor welfare schemes, and ensure timely redressal for grievances.

The bench emphasized that filling these posts promptly is crucial for the statutory body to discharge its duties without hindrance.

State Government Asked to Explain Delay

The court directed the Rajasthan government to file a detailed affidavit explaining reasons for the delay in appointments and the steps taken to fill the vacancies. The government was asked to clarify the timeline and the process being followed to ensure that the commission functions at full strength, as mandated under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights (CPCR) Act.

Legal Obligation and Child Welfare Concerns

Advocates appearing in the matter stressed that the commission plays a critical role in protecting child rights, including overseeing the implementation of policies, investigating child abuse complaints, tracking missing children’s cases, and ensuring legal compliance by government departments.

The court underscored that prolonged vacancies could result in delayed investigations and lapses in child welfare mechanisms, affecting the most vulnerable sections of society.

Next Hearing Scheduled

The matter was adjourned with the court fixing a new date for the government’s response and seeking a timeline for filling the vacancies. The judge made it clear that if satisfactory progress is not shown, the court may issue further directions to expedite appointments.