HC slams SI recruitment, questions RPSC chairman role

April 5, 2026

The Rajasthan High Court has made sharp observations on the Sub-Inspector (SI) recruitment process in Rajasthan, calling the entire exercise a “joke.” The court expressed serious concern over irregularities and lapses, stating that the state government failed to fulfill its responsibility in ensuring a fair and transparent recruitment process.

The remarks came during the hearing of petitions related to alleged irregularities and paper leak issues in the SI recruitment examination.

‘Entire process became a joke,’ says court

In a strong statement, the court noted that the recruitment process had lost its credibility due to mismanagement and lack of accountability. It observed that the situation had undermined the trust of candidates who had worked hard to secure government jobs.

The bench emphasized that such lapses not only affect the careers of aspirants but also damage the integrity of public institutions.

State government pulled up for failure

The High Court held the state government accountable, stating that it failed to discharge its duty of conducting a fair recruitment process. It questioned why timely action was not taken despite indications of irregularities.

The court also expressed dissatisfaction over the handling of the situation, highlighting delays and lack of decisive steps to address the issue.

Role of RPSC chairman under scrutiny

The court specifically raised questions about the role of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission chairman, indicating that accountability must be fixed at the highest level.

It observed that the functioning of the commission during the recruitment process needs thorough examination, and responsibility cannot be avoided. The remarks suggest that the court may seek further explanations from officials involved.

Impact on candidates and recruitment system

Thousands of candidates who appeared for the SI examination have been affected by the controversy. Many aspirants have demanded cancellation of the recruitment and a fresh examination to ensure fairness.

The issue has also sparked wider concerns about the credibility of recruitment processes in the state, with calls for stricter measures to prevent paper leaks and malpractice.

Possibility of further action

Legal experts believe that the court’s strong observations could lead to significant decisions, including cancellation of the recruitment process or ordering a fresh examination. The state government may also be directed to take action against those found responsible.

The matter is still under consideration, and further hearings are expected to determine the next course of action.