Sabarimala Case: Centre Backs Curbs on Women’s Entry

April 9, 2026

New Delhi, April 9: The Centre also raised objections to the 2018 Supreme Court verdict that allowed women of all age groups to enter the temple. It argued that the judgment was flawed and based on an assumption that men are superior to women. Earlier, the court had ruled that banning women aged 10–50 violated their fundamental rights, including equality and freedom of religion.

The Centre now says the verdict did not fully consider the religious significance and customs associated with the temple.

Faith vs Equality Debate

The Sabarimala issue continues to highlight a larger debate between religious freedom and gender equality. While many support equal access to places of worship, others believe that certain traditions must be preserved as part of faith. The temple is dedicated to Lord Ayyappa, considered a celibate deity and this belief has historically been cited as the reason for restricting entry of women of a certain age group.

What Happens Next

The case is being heard by a larger bench of the Supreme Court, which is examining broader constitutional questions. The final ruling could have far-reaching implications for how courts handle conflicts between religious practices and fundamental rights.